Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Bad debts - CIT(A) and Tribunal concurrently held that the respondent bank would also be a scheduled bank and consequently allowed the bad debts u/s 36(1)(viia)(a) of the Act. Such being the position, we find no error in the view.
Bad debts - CIT(A) and Tribunal concurrently held that the respondent bank would also be a scheduled bank and consequently allowed the bad debts u/s 36(1)(viia)(a) of the Act. Such being the position, we find no error in the view.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.