Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Revision u/s 263 - case of “no enquiry” - admittedly Assessing Officer at assessment stage has not verified amount shown under “suspense account”. It is very apparent that Assessing Officer has not verified its sources and mode of deposit - revision proceedings upheld.
Revision u/s 263 - case of “no enquiry” - admittedly Assessing Officer at assessment stage has not verified amount shown under “suspense account”. It is very apparent that Assessing Officer has not verified its sources and mode of deposit - revision proceedings upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.