Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3761 to 3780 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - it is found that refund amount, in question, had not been reflected by the respondent under the heads of account of Loans & Advances, as “claims receivable” from the Central Excise Department. - Refund cannot be allowed.
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - it is found that refund amount, in question, had not been reflected by the respondent under the heads of account of Loans & Advances, as “claims receivable” from the Central Excise Department. - Refund cannot be allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.