Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves have detected the consignment and intimated to the Custom Department that the consignment is carrying some suspicious goods, therefore, it was 100% examined - penalty u/s 114 is not imposable.
Imposition of penalties - It is the appellants who themselves have detected the consignment and intimated to the Custom Department that the consignment is carrying some suspicious goods, therefore, it was 100% examined - penalty u/s 114 is not imposable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.