Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Refund denied on the ground that on the date of filing of bill of entry i.e. 21.01.2013 the rate of customs duty was enhanced from 4% to 6% - since the Notification was published and offered for sale on 04.02.2013, the same will be effective from that date only
Refund denied on the ground that on the date of filing of bill of entry i.e. 21.01.2013 the rate of customs duty was enhanced from 4% to 6% - since the Notification was published and offered for sale on 04.02.2013, the same will be effective from that date only
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.