Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Having alleged that the appellants have availed CENVAT credit on the items removed as waste and scrap, the onus is on the department to prove that such credit was availed by the appellants. This burden has not at all been discharged by the department.
Having alleged that the appellants have availed CENVAT credit on the items removed as waste and scrap, the onus is on the department to prove that such credit was availed by the appellants. This burden has not at all been discharged by the department.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.