Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Scrutiny/ regular assessment u/s 143(3) - validity of notice issued u/s 143(2) - Belated claim of refund with interest by making application u/s 119(1)(b)(c) - There is no ambiguity under the law that the scrutiny assessment is to be framed as per the provisions of Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Instruction No. 13/2006 would not override these provisions.
Scrutiny/ regular assessment u/s 143(3) - validity of notice issued u/s 143(2) - Belated claim of refund with interest by making application u/s 119(1)(b)(c) - There is no ambiguity under the law that the scrutiny assessment is to be framed as per the provisions of Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Instruction No. 13/2006 would not override these provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
