Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Levy of penalty u/s 271D - transaction between husband and wife - transaction of loan between husband and wife does not attract the provisions of section 269SS - Penalty levied u/s 271D of the Act in the instant case is not justified.
Levy of penalty u/s 271D - transaction between husband and wife - transaction of loan between husband and wife does not attract the provisions of section 269SS - Penalty levied u/s 271D of the Act in the instant case is not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.