Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Settlement charges paid to SEBI - penalty paid for infraction of law - payment was neither in the nature of protection money, nor extortion, nor hafta nor bribe nor a payment for a purpose namely, settlement, which can be said to be “an offence” or which can be said to be “prohibited by law” - allowable expenditure u/s 37(1)
Settlement charges paid to SEBI - penalty paid for infraction of law - payment was neither in the nature of protection money, nor extortion, nor hafta nor bribe nor a payment for a purpose namely, settlement, which can be said to be “an offence” or which can be said to be “prohibited by law” - allowable expenditure u/s 37(1)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.