Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Addition u/s.68 - unexplained share application money - The mere fact that “assessee” company chooses to show the receipt of the money as capital does not preclude the ITO from going into the question whether this is actually so. - AT
Addition u/s.68 - unexplained share application money - The mere fact that “assessee” company chooses to show the receipt of the money as capital does not preclude the ITO from going into the question whether this is actually so. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.