Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 40A(3) - payments of expenditure in cash exceeding permeable limits - payments were made in cash for the business expediency of the assessee and as per requirement specified by BSNL. - even if the assessee does not fall in any of the clause of Rule 6DD, invoking the provisions of section 40A(3) can be dispensed with. - AT
Addition u/s 40A(3) - payments of expenditure in cash exceeding permeable limits - payments were made in cash for the business expediency of the assessee and as per requirement specified by BSNL. - even if the assessee does not fall in any of the clause of Rule 6DD, invoking the provisions of section 40A(3) can be dispensed with. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.