Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - appellant had paid more duty at the time of clearance from the factory to depot, but have ultimately charged and realized less duty on the sale effected from the Depot - The refund has been denied simply based on presumptions, which is not tenable. - Refund allowed - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - appellant had paid more duty at the time of clearance from the factory to depot, but have ultimately charged and realized less duty on the sale effected from the Depot - The refund has been denied simply based on presumptions, which is not tenable. - Refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
