Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme court. - as there were two views were available, the Ld. CIT should not be allowed to invoke the powers u/s.263. - If the answer of the above refereed question held as yes, then the Ld. CIT will invoke power in each and every cases and will create a huge mess. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme court. - as there were two views were available, the Ld. CIT should not be allowed to invoke the powers u/s.263. - If the answer of the above refereed question held as yes, then the Ld. CIT will invoke power in each and every cases and will create a huge mess. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
