Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme court. - as there were two views were available, the Ld. CIT should not be allowed to invoke the powers u/s.263. - If the answer of the above refereed question held as yes, then the Ld. CIT will invoke power in each and every cases and will create a huge mess. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme court. - as there were two views were available, the Ld. CIT should not be allowed to invoke the powers u/s.263. - If the answer of the above refereed question held as yes, then the Ld. CIT will invoke power in each and every cases and will create a huge mess. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
