Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme court. - as there were two views were available, the Ld. CIT should not be allowed to invoke the powers u/s.263. - If the answer of the above refereed question held as yes, then the Ld. CIT will invoke power in each and every cases and will create a huge mess. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme court. - as there were two views were available, the Ld. CIT should not be allowed to invoke the powers u/s.263. - If the answer of the above refereed question held as yes, then the Ld. CIT will invoke power in each and every cases and will create a huge mess. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.