Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - provision for leave encashment - dispute was only relating to the year in which the said expenses are allowable and not about the very deductibility of the said expenses as the genuineness of the same was neither disputed nor doubted - no penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - provision for leave encashment - dispute was only relating to the year in which the said expenses are allowable and not about the very deductibility of the said expenses as the genuineness of the same was neither disputed nor doubted - no penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.