Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rebate claim - The inaction on the part of the Department is not appreciable and it is a clear case, where the officials were blatantly violated the circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi wherein it is specifically stated that, in no case, the refund claim should be kept pending beyond the period of three months. - HC
Rebate claim - The inaction on the part of the Department is not appreciable and it is a clear case, where the officials were blatantly violated the circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi wherein it is specifically stated that, in no case, the refund claim should be kept pending beyond the period of three months. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.