Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - assessee claimed the amount received as guarantee fee for advance received from Ginza - the real intent of Ginza in advancing the sums it did to the assessee was to share its profit by way of deemed dividend - Decided in favor of revenue - HC
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - assessee claimed the amount received as guarantee fee for advance received from Ginza - the real intent of Ginza in advancing the sums it did to the assessee was to share its profit by way of deemed dividend - Decided in favor of revenue - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
