Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Job work - N/N. 214/86 dated 25.03.1986 - declaration/ certificate by the principle manufacturer not filed - double benefit of exemption on the same raw material is not permissible especially when the appellant has manufactured the excisable goods which have the industrial market and cleared the same without payment of duty - AT
Job work - N/N. 214/86 dated 25.03.1986 - declaration/ certificate by the principle manufacturer not filed - double benefit of exemption on the same raw material is not permissible especially when the appellant has manufactured the excisable goods which have the industrial market and cleared the same without payment of duty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.