Tax deduction compliance and payee income recognition govern consultancy disallowance, while no exempt income prevents related expenditure disallowanc...
Derivative abetment liability fails when correctly declared imported components establish no underlying improper importation by the principal importer...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty imposed u/s 272A(2)(c) - Since there is no reasonable cause furnished by the assessee as mentioned u/s 273 of the IT Act for non furnishing of information sought by the ITO(intelligence) u/s 133(6) of the Act it is of the view that the order imposing penalty cannot be quashed. - AT
Penalty imposed u/s 272A(2)(c) - Since there is no reasonable cause furnished by the assessee as mentioned u/s 273 of the IT Act for non furnishing of information sought by the ITO(intelligence) u/s 133(6) of the Act it is of the view that the order imposing penalty cannot be quashed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.