Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4787
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95724 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - burden to prove that incidence of duty passed on to the customer is discharged by the assessee when assessee's invoice during the material period showing a composite price and duty not indicated separately. - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - burden to prove that incidence of duty passed on to the customer is discharged by the assessee when assessee's invoice during the material period showing a composite price and duty not indicated separately. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
