Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Duty drawback u/s 74 of CA - filing the refund claim under wrong provisions does not disentitle the legitimate claim of the appellant. Substantive right of the appellant to file their claim under the correct provisions of the Act cannot be denied, therefore, the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is available to the appellant. - AT
Duty drawback u/s 74 of CA - filing the refund claim under wrong provisions does not disentitle the legitimate claim of the appellant. Substantive right of the appellant to file their claim under the correct provisions of the Act cannot be denied, therefore, the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is available to the appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.