Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
AO did not record his satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings, because while passing the assessment order passed u/s. 143(3)(ii), the AO has stated that “….. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c)is being initiated separately for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income / concealment income……………….”, which is not sufficient - AT
AO did not record his satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings, because while passing the assessment order passed u/s. 143(3)(ii), the AO has stated that “….. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c)is being initiated separately for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income / concealment income……………….”, which is not sufficient - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
