Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Dismissal of the appeal, on the sole ground that there is a huge pendency involving crores of rupees of revenue and adjudication of lis involving a minor demand of duty of ₹ 7,42,297/- would not be productive, is a failure to exercise the jurisdiction conferred on CESTAT, Madras, both of facts and law. - HC
Dismissal of the appeal, on the sole ground that there is a huge pendency involving crores of rupees of revenue and adjudication of lis involving a minor demand of duty of ₹ 7,42,297/- would not be productive, is a failure to exercise the jurisdiction conferred on CESTAT, Madras, both of facts and law. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.