Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
TDS u/s 195 - Since Section 40(a)(i) as it stood in AY 2006-07 continued to discriminate in the above manner and was inconsistent with Article 24(3) of the Indo Japan DTAA or Article 26 (3) of the Indo US DTAA, the Assessee was entitled to rely on the above DTAA provisions to claim deduction of the sums paid to entities in Japan and USA. - HC
TDS u/s 195 - Since Section 40(a)(i) as it stood in AY 2006-07 continued to discriminate in the above manner and was inconsistent with Article 24(3) of the Indo Japan DTAA or Article 26 (3) of the Indo US DTAA, the Assessee was entitled to rely on the above DTAA provisions to claim deduction of the sums paid to entities in Japan and USA. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
