Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Stay of demand - assessee in default - Petitioner's application under Section 220(2A) rejected - unreasonableness would be in not providing an adequate opportunity to the petitioner - The petitioner cannot be blamed for the delay caused at the Departmental level - HC
Stay of demand - assessee in default - Petitioner's application under Section 220(2A) rejected - unreasonableness would be in not providing an adequate opportunity to the petitioner - The petitioner cannot be blamed for the delay caused at the Departmental level - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.