Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
The “removal” and “clearance” cannot be equated to clear the goods for home consumption under Section 47 of the Customs Act. The permissions to clear the goods would not be in violation of Section 111(j), which is applicable to “removals” and not to the “clearance”. - HC
The “removal” and “clearance” cannot be equated to clear the goods for home consumption under Section 47 of the Customs Act. The permissions to clear the goods would not be in violation of Section 111(j), which is applicable to “removals” and not to the “clearance”. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
