Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - opportunities were provided by the AO to the assessee to substantiate its claim and to disprove the contention of the non-confirming party but the assessee failed to show any initiative as it had not shown any willingness for crossverification and cross-examination of the said party - penalty confirmed - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - opportunities were provided by the AO to the assessee to substantiate its claim and to disprove the contention of the non-confirming party but the assessee failed to show any initiative as it had not shown any willingness for crossverification and cross-examination of the said party - penalty confirmed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
