Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
When the appellant is a Govt. corporation, who paid entire tax demand (through may be some interest still remains payable as it was not quantified by the Revenue), before issue of SCN and where ‘intention to evade payment of tax’ cannot be alleged, then in the light of provisions of Section 73(3) and Section 80 of FA, 1994, no penalty is liable to be imposed on the assessee appellant - AT
When the appellant is a Govt. corporation, who paid entire tax demand (through may be some interest still remains payable as it was not quantified by the Revenue), before issue of SCN and where ‘intention to evade payment of tax’ cannot be alleged, then in the light of provisions of Section 73(3) and Section 80 of FA, 1994, no penalty is liable to be imposed on the assessee appellant - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
