Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Clandestine removal - Preponderance of probability is in favor of Revenue when appellants failed to come out with clean hands. Although appellant tried that investigation should be in dark to unearth the offence committed, they failed since self-speaking evidence came up in the course of investigation - AT
Clandestine removal - Preponderance of probability is in favor of Revenue when appellants failed to come out with clean hands. Although appellant tried that investigation should be in dark to unearth the offence committed, they failed since self-speaking evidence came up in the course of investigation - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.