Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved themselves in clandestine clearance - The goods were accepted and carried by the drivers on the assurance that they would be issued invoices - No penalty - AT
Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved themselves in clandestine clearance - The goods were accepted and carried by the drivers on the assurance that they would be issued invoices - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
