Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved themselves in clandestine clearance - The goods were accepted and carried by the drivers on the assurance that they would be issued invoices - No penalty - AT
Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved themselves in clandestine clearance - The goods were accepted and carried by the drivers on the assurance that they would be issued invoices - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
