Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
The assessee challenged the order before the CIT(A) both on merits as well as on jurisdiction and the limitation grounds - Ld. CIT(A) ought to have first decided the jurisdictional issue and only thereafter should have proceeded to decide the issue on merits if so warranted in law - AT
The assessee challenged the order before the CIT(A) both on merits as well as on jurisdiction and the limitation grounds - Ld. CIT(A) ought to have first decided the jurisdictional issue and only thereafter should have proceeded to decide the issue on merits if so warranted in law - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.