Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Over-charge towards wharfage claim from the Board of Trustees - refund of the amount allegedly paid in excess - Period of limitation - revival of extinguished claim - Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act stipulates six months from the date of “accrual of the cause of action” whereas Section 55 stipulates “six months from the date of the payment” - SC
Over-charge towards wharfage claim from the Board of Trustees - refund of the amount allegedly paid in excess - Period of limitation - revival of extinguished claim - Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act stipulates six months from the date of “accrual of the cause of action” whereas Section 55 stipulates “six months from the date of the payment” - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.