Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Over-charge towards wharfage claim from the Board of Trustees - refund of the amount allegedly paid in excess - Period of limitation - revival of extinguished claim - Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act stipulates six months from the date of “accrual of the cause of action” whereas Section 55 stipulates “six months from the date of the payment” - SC
Over-charge towards wharfage claim from the Board of Trustees - refund of the amount allegedly paid in excess - Period of limitation - revival of extinguished claim - Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act stipulates six months from the date of “accrual of the cause of action” whereas Section 55 stipulates “six months from the date of the payment” - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.