Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - the price charged by the appellant did not include the element of duty - though they have mentioned the duty element, the same has not been received from the dealer - refund allowed - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - the price charged by the appellant did not include the element of duty - though they have mentioned the duty element, the same has not been received from the dealer - refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.