Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - the price charged by the appellant did not include the element of duty - though they have mentioned the duty element, the same has not been received from the dealer - refund allowed - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - the price charged by the appellant did not include the element of duty - though they have mentioned the duty element, the same has not been received from the dealer - refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.