Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Job-work - benefit of N/N. 214/96 and N/N. 84/95-CE cannot be extended to the appellant as the requisite undertakings have not been given by the appellant - These undertakings are not merely procedural undertaking but substantive undertaking in so far as by virtue of this undertaking, the principal manufacturer takes the responsibility of duty liability in case it arose - AT
Job-work - benefit of N/N. 214/96 and N/N. 84/95-CE cannot be extended to the appellant as the requisite undertakings have not been given by the appellant - These undertakings are not merely procedural undertaking but substantive undertaking in so far as by virtue of this undertaking, the principal manufacturer takes the responsibility of duty liability in case it arose - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.