Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 112(a) of the CA, 1962 - Mis-declaration of goods - The goods stand absolutely confiscated without giving an option for redemption - The importer seems to have accepted this and forfeited this consignment. - However for the offence of misdeclaration, the importer will be liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the CA, 1962. - AT
Penalty u/s 112(a) of the CA, 1962 - Mis-declaration of goods - The goods stand absolutely confiscated without giving an option for redemption - The importer seems to have accepted this and forfeited this consignment. - However for the offence of misdeclaration, the importer will be liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the CA, 1962. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
