Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) - commission payment - it was only required to see if the expenditure claimed to have been borne by the assessee was genuine. If the answer on this issue were in favour of the assessee, then it would be of little consequence how the recipient has dealt with the money received by him from the assessee - HC
Allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) - commission payment - it was only required to see if the expenditure claimed to have been borne by the assessee was genuine. If the answer on this issue were in favour of the assessee, then it would be of little consequence how the recipient has dealt with the money received by him from the assessee - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
