Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) - commission payment - it was only required to see if the expenditure claimed to have been borne by the assessee was genuine. If the answer on this issue were in favour of the assessee, then it would be of little consequence how the recipient has dealt with the money received by him from the assessee - HC
Allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) - commission payment - it was only required to see if the expenditure claimed to have been borne by the assessee was genuine. If the answer on this issue were in favour of the assessee, then it would be of little consequence how the recipient has dealt with the money received by him from the assessee - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.