Exemption for non-air-conditioned restaurant services survives where the establishment's air-conditioned section is separately identifiable and taxabl...
Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in sustaining the penalty on the husband of the dormant partner, while sustaining the penalty on the Partnership Firm? - Though his wife is the partner, for all practical purposes, he was acting on her behalf as the partner. - Held Yes - HC
Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in sustaining the penalty on the husband of the dormant partner, while sustaining the penalty on the Partnership Firm? - Though his wife is the partner, for all practical purposes, he was acting on her behalf as the partner. - Held Yes - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.