Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Revision u/s 263 - In the present case the petitioner had informed the department as to its address before the initiation of proceeding. Therefore it was obligatory on the part of the department to attempt to serve notice at the new address. - HC
Revision u/s 263 - In the present case the petitioner had informed the department as to its address before the initiation of proceeding. Therefore it was obligatory on the part of the department to attempt to serve notice at the new address. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.