Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Since the appellants have not declared in their ST3 Returns that input service credit was used in relation to trading activity. This amounts to suppression of facts and therefore, the extended period of limitation is correctly invoked - AT
Since the appellants have not declared in their ST3 Returns that input service credit was used in relation to trading activity. This amounts to suppression of facts and therefore, the extended period of limitation is correctly invoked - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.