Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Inasmuch as the petitioner did not comply with this requirement of filing revised returns in respect of the tax amount not paid u/s under Section 6(2), no fault found with orders passed by the 1st respondent, cancelling the permission granted to the petitioner for payment of tax under compounded rate. - HC
Inasmuch as the petitioner did not comply with this requirement of filing revised returns in respect of the tax amount not paid u/s under Section 6(2), no fault found with orders passed by the 1st respondent, cancelling the permission granted to the petitioner for payment of tax under compounded rate. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
