Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
ITAT was not right in law in holding that deduction of interest expenses was not admissible u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 merely because shares were never allotted to the appellant in response to the share application. - HC
ITAT was not right in law in holding that deduction of interest expenses was not admissible u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 merely because shares were never allotted to the appellant in response to the share application. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
