Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise rules, 2002 read with section 11AC of the Act are not warranted. - AT
Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise rules, 2002 read with section 11AC of the Act are not warranted. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.