Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Refund - Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Refund was rejected on the ground that the average export clearance of final products of the appellant in the preceding quarter was less than 50% of the total clearance and did not satisfy the condition in Notification No. 5/2006 (C.E.) N.T. dated 14.3.2006 - The interpretation resorted by the authorities is incorrect - refund allowed - AT
Refund - Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Refund was rejected on the ground that the average export clearance of final products of the appellant in the preceding quarter was less than 50% of the total clearance and did not satisfy the condition in Notification No. 5/2006 (C.E.) N.T. dated 14.3.2006 - The interpretation resorted by the authorities is incorrect - refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
