Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Claim of refund of export duty paid where goods could not be exported - Period of limitation - even though on payment of export duty, the Let Export Order (LEO) was received on 09.12.2011 - shipping bill was allowed to be cancelled only on 23.01.2013 and they had filed the refund claim on 10.05.2013. - Refund is beyond the normal period of limitation - AT
Claim of refund of export duty paid where goods could not be exported - Period of limitation - even though on payment of export duty, the Let Export Order (LEO) was received on 09.12.2011 - shipping bill was allowed to be cancelled only on 23.01.2013 and they had filed the refund claim on 10.05.2013. - Refund is beyond the normal period of limitation - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.