Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Claim of refund of export duty paid where goods could not be exported - Period of limitation - even though on payment of export duty, the Let Export Order (LEO) was received on 09.12.2011 - shipping bill was allowed to be cancelled only on 23.01.2013 and they had filed the refund claim on 10.05.2013. - Refund is beyond the normal period of limitation - AT
Claim of refund of export duty paid where goods could not be exported - Period of limitation - even though on payment of export duty, the Let Export Order (LEO) was received on 09.12.2011 - shipping bill was allowed to be cancelled only on 23.01.2013 and they had filed the refund claim on 10.05.2013. - Refund is beyond the normal period of limitation - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.